retailreport.at Retailreport.at

   
RetailREPORT | Das österreichische Portal für den Handel

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Retailreport.at?

• Retailreport.at ranks #5,650,302 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Retailreport.at?

• 9.4E-6% of global Internet users visit Retailreport.at

How many people visit Retailreport.at each day?

• Retailreport.at receives approximately 461 visitors and 187 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Retailreport.at receive most of its visitors from?

• Retailreport.at is mostly visited by people located in Austria,Colombia,United States.

How much Retailreport.at can earn?

• Retailreport.at should earn about $0.54/day from advertising revenue.

What is Retailreport.at estimated value?

• Estimated value of Retailreport.at is $437.55.

What IP addresses does Retailreport.at resolve to?

• Retailreport.at resolves to the IP addresses 18.157.153.116.

Where are Retailreport.at servers located in?

• Retailreport.at has servers located in Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60313, Germany.

retailreport.at Profile

Title:retailREPORT | Das österreichische Portal für den Handel
Description:retailREPORT informiert als unabhängiges B2B-Portal über alle aktuellen Themen im österreichischen Handel sowie in der Welt der Markenartikel-Industrie.
Tags:
leh
handel
dfh
Österreich
Category:Food and Drink / Other Food and Drink
About: Retailreport.at is a platform that focuses on providing in-depth analysis and reports on the retail industry. It covers a wide range of topics relevant to retailers, including market trends, consumer behavior, sales strategies, technological advancements, and industry challenges. The site aims to serve as a comprehensive resource for professionals in the retail sector, offering insights that can help businesses make informed decisions and stay competitive in a rapidly changing market. Additionally, retailreport.at may feature expert opinions, case studies, and interviews with industry leaders to offer a well-rounded perspective on the current state and future of retail.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does retailreport.at use?

These are the technologies used at retailreport.at. retailreport.at has a total of 7 technologies installed in 7 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
CMS
Drupal Drupal
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
Operating Systems
Ubuntu Ubuntu
Cookie compliance
Usercentrics Usercentrics
Programming Languages
PHP PHP

retailreport.at Traffic Analysis

Retailreport.at is ranked #5,650,302 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 461 visitors daily, generating a total of 187 pageviews. This equates to about 14K monthly visitors. Retailreport.at traffic has decreased by 21.59% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors461
15.78%
Monthly Visits14K
21.59%
Pages per Visit0.41
100%
Visit duration00:15
Bounce Rate70.50%
99.73%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
461
Monthly Visits:
13,968
Pages per Visit:
0.41
Daily Pageviews:
187
Avg. visit duration:
00:15
Bounce rate:
70.50%
Global Reach:
9.4E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
730
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
603
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
14,114
HypeRank:
5,650,302
SEMrush Rank:
14,263,497
SimilarWeb Rank:
7,321,900
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
99.73%
Referral:
0.14%
Search:
0.14%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

20.4K
MAR
17.8K
APR
14K
MAY

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Austria 25.79%
 
Colombia 7.84%
 
United States 7.03%
 
Turkey 6.77%
 
Viet Nam 5.71%

Where do visitors go on retailreport.at?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
retailreport.at
100.00%100.00%1

Which sites are competitors to retailreport.at?

Websites similar to retailreport.at are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 267 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with retailreport.at in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
6,400
Bing Index:
2,210

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  retailreport.at
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  14,263,497
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  19
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  10
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.5 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $16.2 and annual gross revenue of approximately $197.1. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $437.6.

How much would retailreport.at make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.54
Monthly Revenue:
$16.20
Yearly Revenue:
$197.10
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Austria 48$0.10
 
United States 13$0.06
 
Colombia 15$0.01
 
Viet Nam 11$0.01
 
Turkey 13$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.04
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1.14
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$13.84
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
17
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
522
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
6,347

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Austria 13$0.03
 
United States 2$0.01
 
Colombia 1$0.00
 
Viet Nam 0$0.00
 
Turkey 1$0.00

How much is retailreport.at worth?

Website Value:
$437.6

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
retailreport.at
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
retailreport.at
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
retailreport.at
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is retailreport.at hosted? ▼

Retailreport.at may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
18.157.153.116
ASN:
AS16509 
ISP:
Amazon.com, Inc. 
Server Location:
Frankfurt am Main
Hesse, HE
60313
Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 18.157.153.116

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does retailreport.at load? ▼

The average loading time of retailreport.at is 646 ms. The Desktop speed index is 38 and mobile speed index is 35.
Average Load Time:
646 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

38
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)36ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 72% 22% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 22% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 84% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 60% 19% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19% 19% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 19%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 8%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)36ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.7s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 72% 22% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 22% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets
Speed Index 2.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Largest Contentful Paint 1.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 600 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 350 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint 1.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
Time to Interactive 2.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

35
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)9ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 76% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 60% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 25% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)11ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)133ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.8s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)9ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 76% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 22% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 56% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 56% 25% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 25% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 73% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 73% 18% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 18% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 7%
First Input Delay (FID)11ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)133ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.8s 70% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 70% 21% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 21% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn how to preconnect to required origins
First Contentful Paint 2.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 10.0 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets
Max Potential First Input Delay 1,290 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 8.7 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets
Largest Contentful Paint 7.1 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 2,360 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
First Meaningful Paint 3.5 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Does retailreport.at use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on retailreport.at are reduced by 89%.
retailreport.at use gzip compression.
Original size: 140.4 KB
Compressed size: 14.22 KB
File reduced by: 126.18 KB (89%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. retailreport.at supports HTTPS.
 retailreport.at supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.retailreport.at
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid from: Feb 9 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 9 23:59:59 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Amazon Root CA 1
Valid from: Aug 23 22:25:30 2022 GMT
Valid until: Aug 23 22:25:30 2030 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Amazon Root CA 1
Organization: Amazon
Location: US
Issuer: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Valid from: May 25 12:00:00 2015 GMT
Valid until: Dec 31 01:00:00 2037 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: Starfield Services Root Certificate Authority - G2
Organization: "Starfield Technologies, Inc."
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona, US
Issuer:
Valid from: Sep 2 00:00:00 2009 GMT
Valid until: Jun 28 17:39:16 2034 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 retailreport.at supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:27:27 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
location: https://retailreport.at/home-retail
server: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-drupal-route-normalizer: 1
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
content-language: de
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cache-control: must-revalidate, no-cache, private
expires: Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT
x-generator: Drupal 9 (https://www.drupal.org)
x-drupal-cache: HIT

HTTP/2 200 
date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 16:27:27 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
server: Apache/2.4.52 (Ubuntu)
x-content-type-options: nosniff
cache-control: must-revalidate, no-cache, private
x-drupal-dynamic-cache: UNCACHEABLE
x-ua-compatible: IE=edge
content-language: de
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
expires: Sun, 19 Nov 1978 05:00:00 GMT
x-generator: Drupal 9 (https://www.drupal.org)
x-drupal-cache: HIT
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
TXT v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.de ?all 300
MX retailreport-at.mail.protection.outlook.de 300
SOA 900
Mname ns-351.awsdns-43.com
Rname awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com
Serial Number 1
Refresh 7200
Retry 900
Expire 1209600
Minimum TTL 86400
A 18.157.153.116 38
A 3.76.108.161 38
A 35.157.155.240 38
NS ns-891.awsdns-47.net 10703
NS ns-1468.awsdns-55.org 10703
NS ns-1647.awsdns-13.co.uk 10703
NS ns-351.awsdns-43.com 10703

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 1, 1970 and will expire on January 1, 1970 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar IONOS SE ( https://nic.at/registrar/22 ). The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on June 5, 2020.
Domain Created:
1970-01-01
Domain Expires:
1970-01-01
Domain Updated:
2020-06-05
Domain Age:
55 years 2 months 6 days
Domain Registrar:
IONOS SE ( https://nic.at/registrar/22 )
Domain Owner:
WhoIs:
 

% Copyright (c)2024 by NIC.AT (3)                                       
%
% Restricted rights.
%
% Except  for  agreed Internet  operational  purposes, no  part  of this
% information  may  be reproduced,  stored  in  a  retrieval  system, or
% transmitted, in  any  form  or by  any means,  electronic, mechanical,
% recording, or otherwise, without prior  permission of NIC.AT on behalf
% of itself and/or the copyright  holders.  Any use of this  material to
% target advertising  or similar activities is explicitly  forbidden and
% can be prosecuted.
%
% It is furthermore strictly forbidden to use the Whois-Database in such
% a  way  that  jeopardizes or  could jeopardize  the  stability  of the
% technical  systems of  NIC.AT  under any circumstances. In particular,
% this includes  any misuse  of the  Whois-Database and  any  use of the
% Whois-Database which disturbs its operation.
%
% Should the  user violate  these points,  NIC.AT reserves  the right to
% deactivate  the  Whois-Database   entirely  or  partly  for  the user.
% Moreover,  the  user  shall be  held liable  for  any  and all  damage
% arising from a violation of these points.

% Quota exceeded