giambronelaw.it Giambronelaw.it

   
Giambrone & Partners - Studio Legale Internazionale Associato

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Giambronelaw.it?

• Giambronelaw.it ranks #1,291,472 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Giambronelaw.it?

• 1.57E-5% of global Internet users visit Giambronelaw.it

How many people visit Giambronelaw.it each day?

• Giambronelaw.it receives approximately 772 visitors and 1,138 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Giambronelaw.it receive most of its visitors from?

• Giambronelaw.it is mostly visited by people located in Italy,United Kingdom,Spain.

How much Giambronelaw.it can earn?

• Giambronelaw.it should earn about $0.32/day from advertising revenue.

What is Giambronelaw.it estimated value?

• Estimated value of Giambronelaw.it is $308.21.

What IP addresses does Giambronelaw.it resolve to?

• Giambronelaw.it resolves to the IP addresses 83.222.239.228.

Where are Giambronelaw.it servers located in?

• Giambronelaw.it has servers located in Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO5, United Kingdom.

giambronelaw.it Profile

Title:Giambrone & Partners - Studio Legale Internazionale Associato
Description:Pluripremiato studio legale internazionale con oltre 100 avvocati esperti in casi e problematiche transfrontaliere, operanti da più di 15 anni in Italia, con sedi a Palermo, Roma, Napoli, Milano e Sassari.
Category:Finance / Other Finance
Edit Site Info

What technologies does giambronelaw.it use?

These are the technologies used at giambronelaw.it. giambronelaw.it has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
CDN
Google Hosted Libraries Google Hosted Libraries
Tag Managers
Google Tag Manager Google Tag Manager
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph

giambronelaw.it Traffic Analysis

Giambronelaw.it is ranked #1,291,472 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 772 visitors daily, generating a total of 1.1K pageviews. This equates to about 23.4K monthly visitors. Giambronelaw.it traffic has decreased by 32.41% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors772
9.98%
Monthly Visits23.4K
32.41%
Pages per Visit1.47
32.54%
Visit duration00:25
674.05%
Bounce Rate77.47%
1.85%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
772
Monthly Visits:
23,392
Pages per Visit:
1.47
Daily Pageviews:
1,138
Avg. visit duration:
00:25
Bounce rate:
77.47%
Global Reach:
1.57E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
18,503
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
17,936
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
22,930
HypeRank:
1,291,472
SEMrush Rank:
6,408,134
SimilarWeb Rank:
1,291,472
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
43.23%
Referral:
1.76%
Search:
53.99%
Social:
0%
Paid:
1.02%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
62.76%
Mobile:
37.24%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

18.9K
DEC
34.6K
JAN
23.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Italy 98.01%
 
United Kingdom 1.78%
 
Spain 0.20%

Which sites are competitors to giambronelaw.it?

Websites similar to giambronelaw.it are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 1 day ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with giambronelaw.it in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  giambronelaw.it
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  6,408,134
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  47
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  19
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $9.6 and annual gross revenue of approximately $116.8. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $308.2.

How much would giambronelaw.it make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.32
Monthly Revenue:
$9.60
Yearly Revenue:
$116.80
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Italy 1,115$0.27
 
United Kingdom 20$0.05
 
Spain 2$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.05
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1.63
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$19.86
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
193
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
5,799
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
70,556

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Italy 190$0.05
 
United Kingdom 3$0.01
 
Spain 0$0.00

How much is giambronelaw.it worth?

Website Value:
$308.2

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
giambronelaw.it
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
giambronelaw.it
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
giambronelaw.it
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is giambronelaw.it hosted? ▼

Giambronelaw.it may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
83.222.239.228
ASN:
AS13768 
ISP:
Cogeco Peer 1 
Server Location:
Portsmouth
Portsmouth, POR
PO5
United Kingdom, GB
 

Other sites hosted on 83.222.239.228

How fast does giambronelaw.it load? ▼

The average loading time of giambronelaw.it is 1652 ms. The Desktop speed index is 88 and mobile speed index is 64.
Average Load Time:
1652 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

88
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)7ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 81% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 15% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 7% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 83% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 15% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 15% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)36ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 85% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 85% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.3s 11% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 80% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 80% 8% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 8%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 14% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 14% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)35ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Total Blocking Time 110 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Speed Index 2.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Time to Interactive 2.1 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

64
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 7% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 85% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 85% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.9s 80% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 71% 23% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 23% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)121ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 6% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.1s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 10% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 10% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.5s 2% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2% 86% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 86% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 10%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.1s 57% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 57% 33% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 33% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)95ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.4s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 79% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 90 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 9.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 6.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 5.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Contentful Paint 4.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Does giambronelaw.it use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on giambronelaw.it are reduced by %.
giambronelaw.it does not use compression.
Original size: 72.53 KB
Compressed size: n/a
File reduced by: (%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. giambronelaw.it supports HTTPS.
 giambronelaw.it supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.giambronelaw.com
Organization: Giambrone Europe LLP
Location: London, GB
Issuer: "Viking Cloud Organization Validation CA, Level 1"
Valid from: Mar 18 06:26:52 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 2 06:25:52 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: "Viking Cloud Organization Validation CA, Level 1"
Organization: "Viking Cloud, Inc."
Location: US
Issuer: SecureTrust CA
Valid from: Jun 9 11:15:00 2022 GMT
Valid until: Dec 15 17:15:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 giambronelaw.it supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:12:03 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 162
location: https://www.giambronelaw.it/

HTTP/2 200 
date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:12:04 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
server: Apache
set-cookie: _cmsdevice=; domain=www.giambronelaw.it; path=/; expires=Tue, 24-Mar-2026 23:12:03 GMT; secure
set-cookie: Apache=108.178.0.234.8d1c88c4650f05efc8f9b3bbcd4f1c84; domain=www.giambronelaw.it; path=/; secure
last-modified: Fri, 21 May 2021 09:05:00 GMT
pragma: no-cache
cache-control: no-cache
set-cookie: _cmsdevice=; domain=www.giambronelaw.it; path=/; expires=Tue, 24-Mar-2026 23:12:03 GMT; secure
set-cookie: Apache=108.178.0.234.8d1c88c4650f05efc8f9b3bbcd4f1c84; domain=www.giambronelaw.it; path=/; secure
expires: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 23:12:03 GMT

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 3600
Mname ns0.phase8.net
Rname support.phase8.net
Serial Number 2019060602
Refresh 28800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
MX fwd0.hosts.co.uk 3600
MX fwd2.hosts.co.uk 3600
MX fwd1.hosts.co.uk 3600
A 83.222.239.228 3525
NS ns2.phase8.net 3524
NS ns0.phase8.net 3524
NS ns1.phase8.net 3524

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 9, 2014 and will expire on May 1, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Ascio Technologies Inc.. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on May 17, 2024.
Domain Created:
2014-12-09
Domain Expires:
2025-05-01
Domain Updated:
2024-05-17
Domain Age:
10 years 3 months 17 days
Domain Registrar:
Ascio Technologies Inc.
Domain Owner:
Giambrone Europe LLP
WhoIs:
 

*********************************************************************
* Please note that the following result could be a subgroup of      *
* the data contained in the database.                               *
*                                                                   *
* Additional information can be visualized at:                      *
* http://web-whois.nic.it                                           *
*********************************************************************

Domain:             giambronelaw.it
Status:             ok
Signed:             no
Created:            2014-12-09 13:29:42
Last Update:        2024-05-17 00:47:31
Expire Date:        2025-05-01

Registrant
  Organization:     Giambrone Europe LLP

Admin Contact
  Name:             hidden
  Organization:     hidden

Technical Contacts
  Name:             hidden
  Organization:     hidden

Registrar
  Organization:     Ascio Technologies Inc.
  Name:             ASCIO-REG
  Web:              http://www.ascio.com
  DNSSEC:           no


Nameservers
  ns0.phase8.net
  ns1.phase8.net
  ns2.phase8.net