Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jegan Rajshekar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 20:56, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jegan Rajshekar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:FILMMAKER. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow (✉) 15:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails GNG and fails WP:NFILMMAKER. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete 1) It's an unsourced BLP article. 2) It was written most likely by the subject himself (= COI). 3) I don't think we need a third... -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't appear to be notable. At very best might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:FILMMAKER. -- LACaliNYC✉ 22:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable filmmaker.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable, subject to WP:COI — Amkgp 💬 16:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.