orefinder.gg Orefinder.gg

   
Ore Finder for Minecraft

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Orefinder.gg?

• 0.0001596% of global Internet users visit Orefinder.gg

How many people visit Orefinder.gg each day?

• Orefinder.gg receives approximately 7.9K visitors and 31,393 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Orefinder.gg receive most of its visitors from?

• Orefinder.gg is mostly visited by people located in United States,Canada,United Kingdom.

How much Orefinder.gg can earn?

• Orefinder.gg should earn about $139.30/day from advertising revenue.

What is Orefinder.gg estimated value?

• Estimated value of Orefinder.gg is $134,484.68.

What IP addresses does Orefinder.gg resolve to?

• Orefinder.gg resolves to the IP addresses 2400:52e0:1a01::899:1, 38.32.110.58.

Where are Orefinder.gg servers located in?

• Orefinder.gg has servers located in Phoenix, Arizona, 85036, United States.

orefinder.gg Profile

Title:Ore Finder for Minecraft
Description:Find diamonds, netherite (ancient debris), and more in your Minecraft world with ease! Works with Java and Bedrock Edition.
Category:Games / Other Games
Edit Site Info

What technologies does orefinder.gg use?

These are the technologies used at orefinder.gg. orefinder.gg has a total of 7 technologies installed in 7 different categories.
Static Site Generator
Astro Astro
JavaScript Frameworks
Astro Astro
React React
CDN
Bunny Bunny
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Security
HSTS HSTS
Miscellaneous
PWA PWA
UI frameworks
Radix UI Radix UI

orefinder.gg Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 7.9K visitors daily, generating a total of 31.4K pageviews. This equates to about 238.5K monthly visitors.
Daily Visitors7.9K
Monthly Visits238.5K
Pages per Visit3.99
Visit duration04:35
Bounce Rate39.69%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
7,870
Monthly Visits:
238,461
Pages per Visit:
3.99
Daily Pageviews:
31,393
Avg. visit duration:
04:35
Bounce rate:
39.69%
Global Reach:
0.0001596%
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
238,498
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
243,427
SimilarWeb Rank:
170,778
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Total Visits Last 3 Months

174.7K
DEC
238.5K
JAN
238.5K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 69.53%
 
Canada 7.25%
 
United Kingdom 3.87%
 
Philippines 3.72%
 
Indonesia 2.71%

Which sites are competitors to orefinder.gg?

Websites similar to orefinder.gg are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
mcseedmap.net
Compare >24.2K
Last update was 2 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with orefinder.gg in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  orefinder.gg
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  243,427
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2,976
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  7,091
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $7,732.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $139.3 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $4.2K and annual gross revenue of approximately $50.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $134.5K.

How much would orefinder.gg make?

Daily Revenue:
$139.30
Monthly Revenue:
$4,179.00
Yearly Revenue:
$50,844.50
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 21,829$105.43
 
Canada 2,276$13.75
 
United Kingdom 1,214$3.25
 
Philippines 1,168$0.23
 
Indonesia 852$0.09

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$23.01
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$690.18
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$8,397.17
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
5,268
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
158,044
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,922,870

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 3,929$18.98
 
Canada 569$3.44
 
United Kingdom 194$0.52
 
Indonesia 494$0.05
 
Philippines 82$0.02

How much is orefinder.gg worth?

Website Value:
$134.5K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
orefinder.gg
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
orefinder.gg
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
orefinder.gg
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is orefinder.gg hosted? ▼

Orefinder.gg may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2400:52e0:1a01::899:1, 38.32.110.58
ASN:
AS174 
ISP:
Cogent Communications 
Server Location:
Phoenix
Arizona, AZ
85036
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 38.32.110.58

How fast does orefinder.gg load? ▼

The average loading time of orefinder.gg is 190 ms. The Desktop speed index is 99 and mobile speed index is 84.
Average Load Time:
190 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

99
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)4ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)344ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)622ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)84ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)668ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)8ms 76% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 76% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 17%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)294ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)571ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)84ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)865ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Time to Interactive 1.0 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 0.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

84
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)473ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 87% 9% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)768ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)240ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 68% 22% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 22% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)912ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 81% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 16% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 16%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)322ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)687ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)242ms 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 67% 22% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 22% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 9%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.4s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 3.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 7.6 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Speed Index 3.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Largest Contentful Paint 3.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 80 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading

Does orefinder.gg use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on orefinder.gg are reduced by 75%.
orefinder.gg use gzip compression.
Original size: 28.97 KB
Compressed size: 7.07 KB
File reduced by: 21.9 KB (75%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. orefinder.gg supports HTTPS.
 orefinder.gg supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.orefinder.gg
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R10
Valid from: Feb 19 14:18:58 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 20 14:18:57 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R10
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: ISRG Root X1
Organization: Internet Security Research Group
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Jun 4 11:04:38 2015 GMT
Valid until: Jun 4 11:04:38 2035 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 orefinder.gg supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:31:21 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 166
location: https://www.orefinder.gg/
server: BunnyCDN-PHX1-1155
cdn-pullzone: 2055109
cdn-uid: 27a4e9fb-f26d-4945-941e-309b40fa7c11
cdn-requestcountrycode: US
cache-control: no-cache
cdn-requestid: 16746f1e21a8e99b1ab182129bdd59ce
strict-transport-security: max-age=2592000
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: deny
cdn-requesttime: 2

HTTP/2 200 
date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:31:21 GMT
content-type: text/html
vary: Accept-Encoding
server: BunnyCDN-IL1-1207
cdn-pullzone: 2055109
cdn-uid: 27a4e9fb-f26d-4945-941e-309b40fa7c11
cdn-requestcountrycode: US
cache-control: public, max-age=300
last-modified: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 22:59:40 GMT
cdn-storageserver: NY-267
cdn-fileserver: 749
cdn-proxyver: 1.19
cdn-requestpullsuccess: True
cdn-requestpullcode: 206
cdn-cachedat: 02/19/2025 20:42:49
cdn-edgestorageid: 1233
strict-transport-security: max-age=2592000
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: deny
cdn-requestid: 78a51e21bd7cf56c31ee7f19559134d6
cdn-cache: REVALIDATED
cdn-status: 200
cdn-requesttime: 1
content-encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2400:52e0:1a01::899:1 221
A 38.32.110.58 221
NS dns1.registrar-servers.com 86321
NS dns2.registrar-servers.com 86321
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on June 17, 2023 and will expire on June 17, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar NameCheap, Inc (https://www.namecheap.com). The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 28, 2025.
Domain Created:
2023-06-17
Domain Expires:
2025-06-17
Domain Age:
1 years 9 months 11 days
Domain Registrar:
NameCheap, Inc (https://www.namecheap.com)
Domain Owner:
Redacted for privacy
WhoIs:
 

Domain:
     orefinder.gg

Domain Status:
     Active
     Transfer Prohibited by Registrar

Registrant:
     Redacted for privacy

Registrar:
     NameCheap, Inc (https://www.namecheap.com)

Relevant dates:
     Registered on 17th June 2023 at 21:17:47.129
     Registry fee due on 17th June each year

Registration status:
     Registered until cancelled

Name servers:
     dns1.registrar-servers.com
     dns2.registrar-servers.com
     

WHOIS lookup made on Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 10:32:40 GMT

This WHOIS information is provided for free by CIDR, operator of
the backend registry for domain names ending in GG, JE, and AS.

Copyright (c) and database right Island Networks 1996 - 2025.

You may not access this WHOIS server or use any data from it except
as permitted by our Terms and Conditions which are published
at http://www.channelisles.net/legal/whoisterms

They include restrictions and prohibitions on

- using or re-using the data for advertising;
- using or re-using the service for commercial purposes without a licence;
- repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse;
- obscuring, removing or hiding any or all of this notice;
- exceeding query rate or volume limits.

The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.