millennium-platform.ru Millennium-platform.ru

   
Миллениум

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Millennium-platform.ru?

• 1.54E-5% of global Internet users visit Millennium-platform.ru

How many people visit Millennium-platform.ru each day?

• Millennium-platform.ru receives approximately 758 visitors and 9,092 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Millennium-platform.ru receive most of its visitors from?

• Millennium-platform.ru is mostly visited by people located in Russian Federation,United States.

How much Millennium-platform.ru can earn?

• Millennium-platform.ru should earn about $4.13/day from advertising revenue.

What is Millennium-platform.ru estimated value?

• Estimated value of Millennium-platform.ru is $4,703.97.

What IP addresses does Millennium-platform.ru resolve to?

• Millennium-platform.ru resolves to the IP addresses 78.155.198.26.

Where are Millennium-platform.ru servers located in?

• Millennium-platform.ru has servers located in Russia.

millennium-platform.ru Profile

Title:Миллениум
Edit Site Info

What technologies does millennium-platform.ru use?

These are the technologies used at millennium-platform.ru. millennium-platform.ru has a total of 5 technologies installed in 5 different categories.
CDN
Google Hosted Libraries Google Hosted Libraries
Security
HSTS HSTS
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
Miscellaneous
PWA PWA

millennium-platform.ru Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 758 visitors daily, generating a total of 9.1K pageviews. This equates to about 23K monthly visitors. Millennium-platform.ru traffic has increased by 25.85% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors758
8.56%
Monthly Visits23K
25.85%
Pages per Visit11.99
20.73%
Visit duration22:11
30.62%
Bounce Rate20.88%
11.87%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
758
Monthly Visits:
22,967
Pages per Visit:
11.99
Daily Pageviews:
9,092
Avg. visit duration:
22:11
Bounce rate:
20.88%
Global Reach:
1.54E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
189,256
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
1,852
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
22,972
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
25,038,580
SimilarWeb Rank:
884,862
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
99.00%
Referral:
0%
Search:
1.00%
Social:
0%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

34.7K
DEC
18.2K
JAN
23K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Russian Federation 99.00%
 
United States 1.00%
Last update was 12 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 12 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with millennium-platform.ru in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
28

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  millennium-platform.ru
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  25,038,580
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  2
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $4.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $123.9 and annual gross revenue of approximately $1.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $4.7K.

How much would millennium-platform.ru make?

Daily Revenue:
$4.13
Monthly Revenue:
$123.90
Yearly Revenue:
$1,507.45
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Russian Federation 9,001$3.69
 
United States 91$0.44

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.30
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$9.02
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$109.73
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
556
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
16,694
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
203,105

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Russian Federation 540$0.22
 
United States 16$0.08

How much is millennium-platform.ru worth?

Website Value:
$4.7K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
millennium-platform.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
millennium-platform.ru
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
millennium-platform.ru
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is millennium-platform.ru hosted? ▼

Millennium-platform.ru may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
78.155.198.26
ASN:
AS61976 
ISP:
Codespring SRL 
Server Location:

Russia, RU
 

Other sites hosted on 78.155.198.26

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does millennium-platform.ru load? ▼

The average loading time of millennium-platform.ru is 431 ms. The Desktop speed index is 95 and mobile speed index is 92.
Average Load Time:
431 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

95
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 89% 9% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 9% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)546ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 11% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)882ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)34ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)991ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)3.1s 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 47% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 38% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 38%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 59% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 59% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)44ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.3s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 67% 15% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 15% 17% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 17%

Lab Data

Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
First Contentful Paint 0.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 1.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Speed Index 2.1 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.7 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

92
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)9ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 75% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 24% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)762ms 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 77% 15% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 15% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 80% 9% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9% 10% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 10%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)184ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 77% 19% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 19% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 86% 8% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 8% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 7% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.4s 58% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 58% 23% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 23% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 18%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.0s 72% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 72% 17% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 17% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 9%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)151ms 81% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 81% 15% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 3%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.0s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 2.4 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Speed Index 4.2 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint 2.5 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 5.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Total Blocking Time 10 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric

Does millennium-platform.ru use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on millennium-platform.ru are reduced by 77%.
millennium-platform.ru use gzip compression.
Original size: 29.48 KB
Compressed size: 6.75 KB
File reduced by: 22.73 KB (77%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  NOT_SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. millennium-platform.ru supports HTTPS.
 millennium-platform.ru supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: *.millennium-platform.ru
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2023
Valid from: Mar 29 05:22:38 2024 GMT
Valid until: Apr 30 05:22:37 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: GlobalSign GCC R6 AlphaSSL CA 2023
Organization: GlobalSign nv-sa
Location: BE
Issuer: GlobalSign
Valid from: Jul 19 03:43:25 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jul 19 00:00:00 2026 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 millennium-platform.ru does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Server: QRATOR
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 02:40:43 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=15
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=3600; includeSubDomains
3: Pragma: no-cache
4: Content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Vary: Accept-Encoding
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Pragma: no-cache
Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=nrja4umjb5kbmb1cb8r100otqf; path=/; domain=millennium-platform.ru
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
1: Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
0: Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=nrja4umjb5kbmb1cb8r100otqf; path=/; domain=millennium-platform.ru
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
Cache-Control: no-cache, private
2: Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
X-Frame-Options: DENY
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://millennium-platform.ru
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
A 78.155.198.26 3545
NS ns1.reg.RU 345545
NS ns2.reg.RU 345545

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 24, 2020 and will expire on January 24, 2026 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar REGRU-RU. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 9, 2025.
Domain Created:
2020-01-24
Domain Expires:
2026-01-24
Domain Age:
5 years 1 months 16 days
Domain Registrar:
REGRU-RU
Domain Owner:
Millennium - Business travel solutions Limited Lia
WhoIs:
 

% TCI Whois Service. Terms of use:
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_ru_rf.pdf (in Russian)
% https://tcinet.ru/documents/whois_su.pdf (in Russian)

domain:        MILLENNIUM-PLATFORM.RU
nserver:       ns1.reg.ru.
nserver:       ns2.reg.ru.
state:         REGISTERED, DELEGATED, UNVERIFIED
org:           Millennium - Business travel solutions Limited Liability Company
taxpayer-id:   6316070968
registrar:     REGRU-RU
admin-contact: http://www.reg.ru/whois/admin_contact
created:       2020-01-24T12:28:08Z
paid-till:     2026-01-24T12:28:08Z
free-date:     2026-02-24
source:        TCI

Last updated on 2025-03-09T02:38:01Z