jmads.com Jmads.com

   
Home - JM Ads

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Jmads.com?

• Jmads.com ranks #3,483,053 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Jmads.com?

• 2.4E-6% of global Internet users visit Jmads.com

How many people visit Jmads.com each day?

• Jmads.com receives approximately 117 visitors and 573 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Jmads.com receive most of its visitors from?

• Jmads.com is mostly visited by people located in Pakistan,India,Saudi Arabia.

How much Jmads.com can earn?

• Jmads.com should earn about $0.11/day from advertising revenue.

What is Jmads.com estimated value?

• Estimated value of Jmads.com is $122.80.

What IP addresses does Jmads.com resolve to?

• Jmads.com resolves to the IP addresses 82.112.253.165.

Where are Jmads.com servers located in?

• Jmads.com has servers located in United Kingdom.

jmads.com Profile

Title:Home - JM Ads
Description:Unlock the power of targeted advertising with PushAdss - your gateway to reaching audiences effectively and efficiently.
Edit Site Info

What technologies does jmads.com use?

These are the technologies used at jmads.com. jmads.com has a total of 17 technologies installed in 15 different categories.
Page builders
Elementor Elementor
Advertising
Google AdSense Google AdSense
Analytics
Google Analytics Google Analytics
Site Kit Site Kit
Miscellaneous
HTTP/3 HTTP/3
Open Graph Open Graph
JavaScript Libraries
jQuery jQuery
jQuery Migrate jQuery Migrate
Underscore.js Underscore.js
WordPress themes
Kadence WP Kadence Kadence WP Kadence
Web Servers
Nginx Nginx
Reverse proxies
Nginx Nginx
Programming Languages
PHP PHP
WordPress plugins
Site Kit Site Kit
WPForms WPForms
WooCommerce WooCommerce
Yoast SEO Yoast SEO
Ecommerce
WooCommerce WooCommerce
CMS
WordPress WordPress
Blogs
WordPress WordPress
SEO
Yoast SEO Yoast SEO
Databases
MySQL MySQL

jmads.com Traffic Analysis

Jmads.com is ranked #3,483,053 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 117 visitors daily, generating a total of 573 pageviews. This equates to about 3.5K monthly visitors. Jmads.com traffic has decreased by 71.2% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors117
45.41%
Monthly Visits3.5K
71.2%
Pages per Visit4.89
261.1%
Visit duration07:59
27.22%
Bounce Rate41.39%
88.6%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
117
Monthly Visits:
3,545
Pages per Visit:
4.89
Daily Pageviews:
573
Avg. visit duration:
07:59
Bounce rate:
41.39%
Global Reach:
2.4E-6%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
621
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
309
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
3,446
HypeRank:
3,483,053
SimilarWeb Rank:
3,483,053
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
47.83%
Referral:
8.70%
Search:
8.70%
Social:
34.78%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
100.00%
Mobile:
0%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

4K
DEC
12.3K
JAN
3.5K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Pakistan 80.86%
 
India 18.50%
 
Saudi Arabia 0.64%
Last update was 11 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 13 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with jmads.com in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  jmads.com
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  n/a
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  0
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0.1 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $3.3 and annual gross revenue of approximately $40.2. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $122.8.

How much would jmads.com make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.11
Monthly Revenue:
$3.30
Yearly Revenue:
$40.15
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Pakistan 463$0.07
 
India 106$0.04
 
Saudi Arabia 4$0.00

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$0.03
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$1.02
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$12.39
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
179
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
5,362
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
65,232

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Pakistan 148$0.02
 
India 30$0.01
 
Saudi Arabia 1$0.00

How much is jmads.com worth?

Website Value:
$122.8

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
jmads.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
jmads.com
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
jmads.com
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is jmads.com hosted? ▼

Jmads.com may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
82.112.253.165
ASN:
 
ISP:
 
Server Location:

United Kingdom, GB
 

Other sites hosted on 82.112.253.165

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does jmads.com load? ▼

The average loading time of jmads.com is 1265 ms. The Desktop speed index is 91 and mobile speed index is 63.
Average Load Time:
1265 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

91
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 1% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 75% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 54% 34% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 34% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 75% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)6ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 88% 10% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 10% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.7s 1% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1% 75% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 75% 22% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 22%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)2.2s 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 54% 34% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 34% 11% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)2.5s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 75% 18% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Speed Index 1.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
First Contentful Paint 1.1 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint 1.4 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

63
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 88% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.3s 1% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 55% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 55% 39% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 54% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 32% 39% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 39% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.4s 75% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 50% 30% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.3s 4% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 55% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 55% 39% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 39%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)3.3s 32% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 32% 39% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 39% 28% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 28%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.4s 50% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 50% 30% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 30% 18% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 18%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 6.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 30 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Time to Interactive 6.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Speed Index 6.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Max Potential First Input Delay 80 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Contentful Paint 4.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade

Does jmads.com use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on jmads.com are reduced by 82%.
jmads.com use br compression.
Original size: 128.96 KB
Compressed size: 22.74 KB
File reduced by: 106.22 KB (82%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. jmads.com supports HTTPS.
 jmads.com supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: jmads.com
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Feb 3 04:16:58 2025 GMT
Valid until: May 4 04:16:57 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 jmads.com supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
server: nginx
date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:52:41 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-length: 162
location: https://www.jmads.com/

HTTP/2 200 
server: nginx
date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:52:41 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
set-cookie: PHPSESSID=2e3nrdruuk0emn82c6hj4ncn5d; path=/
expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate
pragma: no-cache
link: <https://www.jmads.com/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
link: <https://www.jmads.com/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/12>; rel="alternate"; title="JSON"; type="application/json"
link: <https://www.jmads.com/>; rel=shortlink
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: master-only
referrer-policy: same-origin
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
content-encoding: br

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
SOA 3600
Mname ns27.domaincontrol.com
Rname dns.jomax.net
Serial Number 2024111205
Refresh 28800
Retry 7200
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 600
A 82.112.253.165 3275
NS ns28.domaincontrol.com 3600
NS ns27.domaincontrol.com 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on September 26, 2003 and will expire on September 26, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar GoDaddy.com, LLC. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on November 12, 2024.
Domain Created:
2003-09-26
Domain Expires:
2025-09-26
Domain Updated:
2024-11-12
Domain Age:
21 years 5 months 16 days
Domain Registrar:
GoDaddy.com, LLC
WhoIs:
 

   Domain Name: JMADS.COM
   Registry Domain ID: 104175600_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
   Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
   Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
   Updated Date: 2024-11-12T16:40:29Z
   Creation Date: 2003-09-26T21:23:24Z
   Registry Expiry Date: 2025-09-26T21:23:24Z
   Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
   Registrar IANA ID: 146
   Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
   Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
   Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
   Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
   Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
   Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
   Name Server: NS27.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
   Name Server: NS28.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
   DNSSEC: unsigned
   URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2025-03-11T20:53:46Z