jamfunk.jp Jamfunk.jp

   
Studio JamPack

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Jamfunk.jp?

• Jamfunk.jp ranks #6,216,826 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Jamfunk.jp?

• 1.6E-6% of global Internet users visit Jamfunk.jp

How many people visit Jamfunk.jp each day?

• Jamfunk.jp receives approximately 79 visitors and 101 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Jamfunk.jp receive most of its visitors from?

• Jamfunk.jp is mostly visited by people located in Japan.

How much Jamfunk.jp can earn?

• Jamfunk.jp should earn about $0.04/day from advertising revenue.

What is Jamfunk.jp estimated value?

• Estimated value of Jamfunk.jp is $37.15.

What IP addresses does Jamfunk.jp resolve to?

• Jamfunk.jp resolves to the IP addresses 219.117.217.169.

Where are Jamfunk.jp servers located in?

• Jamfunk.jp has servers located in Nameri, Shizuoka, 411-0931, Japan.

jamfunk.jp Profile

Title:Studio JamPack
Description:SUNAGAWA Hiroyuki / すながわひろゆき / Studio JamPack group
Tags:
交通系ＩＣカードの本
studio jampack
すながわひろゆき
sunagawa hiroyuki
交通系ＩＣカード
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
Edit Site Info

What technologies does jamfunk.jp use?

These are the technologies used at jamfunk.jp. jamfunk.jp has a total of 3 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
Operating Systems
AlmaLinux AlmaLinux
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
Web Server Extensions
OpenSSL OpenSSL

jamfunk.jp Traffic Analysis

Jamfunk.jp is ranked #6,216,826 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 79 visitors daily, generating a total of 101 pageviews. This equates to about 2.4K monthly visitors.
Daily Visitors79
Monthly Visits2.4K
Pages per Visit1.27
Visit duration00:17
Bounce Rate50.50%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
79
Monthly Visits:
2,394
Pages per Visit:
1.27
Daily Pageviews:
101
Avg. visit duration:
00:17
Bounce rate:
50.50%
Global Reach:
1.6E-6%
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
2,357
HypeRank:
6,216,826
SEMrush Rank:
21,147,139
SimilarWeb Rank:
6,216,826
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Total Visits Last 3 Months

5.6K
DEC
2.4K
JAN
2.4K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Japan 100.00%

Which sites are competitors to jamfunk.jp?

Websites similar to jamfunk.jp are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 18 hours ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

Update will be available in 6 hours
*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with jamfunk.jp in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
373

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  jamfunk.jp
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  21,147,139
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  4
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $0 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.2 and annual gross revenue of approximately $14.6. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $37.2.

How much would jamfunk.jp make?

Daily Revenue:
$0.04
Monthly Revenue:
$1.20
Yearly Revenue:
$14.60
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Japan 101$0.04

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Japan 3$0.00

How much is jamfunk.jp worth?

Website Value:
$37.2

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
jamfunk.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
jamfunk.jp
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
jamfunk.jp
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is jamfunk.jp hosted? ▼

Jamfunk.jp may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
219.117.217.169
ASN:
AS2514 
ISP:
NTT PC Communications, Inc. 
Server Location:
Nameri
Shizuoka, 22
411-0931
Japan, JP
 

Other sites hosted on 219.117.217.169

There are no other sites hosted on this IP

How fast does jamfunk.jp load? ▼

The average loading time of jamfunk.jp is 530 ms. The Desktop speed index is 83 and mobile speed index is 74.
Average Load Time:
530 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

83
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)433ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)655ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)668ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)433ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)655ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)49ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)668ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Time to Interactive 2.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Largest Contentful Paint 2.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Speed Index 1.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
First Contentful Paint 0.5 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

74
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)591ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 13% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)892ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)307ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 83% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 83% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)926ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)591ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 83% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)892ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)307ms 15% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 15% 83% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 83% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)926ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
Optimize DOM size  
A large DOM can increase the duration of style calculations and layout reflows, impacting page responsiveness. A large DOM will also increase memory usage. Learn how to avoid an excessive DOM size
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Largest Contentful Paint 10.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Speed Index 3.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Time to Interactive 10.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric

Does jamfunk.jp use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on jamfunk.jp are reduced by 65%.
jamfunk.jp use gzip compression.
Original size: 6.13 KB
Compressed size: 2.13 KB
File reduced by: 3.99 KB (65%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. jamfunk.jp supports HTTPS.
 jamfunk.jp supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: jamfunk.jp
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Jan 24 09:01:13 2025 GMT
Valid until: Apr 24 09:01:12 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 jamfunk.jp does not support HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 06:08:42 GMT
Server: Apache/2.4.62 (AlmaLinux) OpenSSL/3.2.2
Last-Modified: Fri, 07 Feb 2025 16:06:27 GMT
ETag: "1882-62d8f8a78a6c0-gzip"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Encoding: gzip
Content-Length: 2184
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
MX MX.JamFunk.jp 86400
TXT MS=ms76077300 86400
TXT google-site-verification=TMWxtGm7Lnl0fnSx0PeGUZrqY1WUU1eRExJTRPiDuDs 86400
TXT v=spf1 +ip4:219.117.217.169 +ip4:219.117.217.173 ~all 86400
TXT google-site-verification=VHNsGpb21uWKgOZITWVRcTX5oKzlcXomvXYRRuCLiBM 86400
SOA 86400
Mname NS1.JamFunk.jp
Rname support.jamfunk.net
Serial Number 202502260
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 86400
A 219.117.217.169 86344
NS NS2.JamFunk.jp 86344
NS NS1.JamFunk.jp 86344

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 7, 2006 and will expire on December 31, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on December 31, 2024.
Domain Created:
2006-12-07
Domain Expires:
2025-12-31
Domain Updated:
2024-12-31
Domain Age:
18 years 3 months 5 days
Domain Owner:
SUNAGAWA Hiroyuki
WhoIs:
 

[ JPRS database provides information on network administration. Its use is    ]
[ restricted to network administration purposes. For further information,     ]
[ use 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp help'. To suppress Japanese output, add'/e'     ]
[ at the end of command, e.g. 'whois -h whois.jprs.jp ***/e'.                 ]
Domain Information:
[Domain Name]                   JAMFUNK.JP

[Registrant]                    SUNAGAWA Hiroyuki

[Name Server]                   ns1.jamfunk.jp
[Name Server]                   ns2.jamfunk.jp
[Signing Key]                   

[Created on]                    2006/12/07
[Expires on]                    2025/12/31
[Status]                        Active
[Lock Status]                   DomainTransferLocked
[Lock Status]                   AgentChangeLocked
[Last Updated]                  2025/01/01 01:05:04 (JST)

Contact Information:
[Name]                          Netowl, Inc.
[Email]                         email
[Web Page]                       
[Postal code]                    
[Postal Address]                 
[Phone]                         075-256-8553
[Fax]