filezilla-project.org Filezilla-project.org

   
FileZilla - The free FTP solution

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Filezilla-project.org?

• Filezilla-project.org ranks #203,248 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Filezilla-project.org?

• 0.0007429% of global Internet users visit Filezilla-project.org

How many people visit Filezilla-project.org each day?

• Filezilla-project.org receives approximately 36.6K visitors and 91,811 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Filezilla-project.org receive most of its visitors from?

• Filezilla-project.org is mostly visited by people located in United States,India,Germany.

How much Filezilla-project.org can earn?

• Filezilla-project.org should earn about $325.39/day from advertising revenue.

What is Filezilla-project.org estimated value?

• Estimated value of Filezilla-project.org is $371,103.04.

What IP addresses does Filezilla-project.org resolve to?

• Filezilla-project.org resolves to the IP addresses 2a01:4f8:242:52d0::2, 49.12.121.47.

Where are Filezilla-project.org servers located in?

• Filezilla-project.org has servers located in Strullendorf, Bavaria, 96129, Germany.

filezilla-project.org Profile

Title:FileZilla - The free FTP solution
Description:FileZilla - The free FTP solution for both client and server. Filezilla is open source software distributed free of charge.
Tags:
ftp clients
open source software
filezilla
software
free software
client
ftp server
open source
sftp
server
applications
ftp
ftp software
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Programming and Developer Software
About: Open-source (GNU GPL) FTP client for Windows, Mac OS X and GNU/Linux. Site contains a documentation wiki and a forum. Edit Site Info

What technologies does filezilla-project.org use?

These are the technologies used at filezilla-project.org. filezilla-project.org has a total of 2 technologies installed in 2 different categories.
Web Servers
Apache HTTP Server Apache HTTP Server
Security
HSTS HSTS

filezilla-project.org Traffic Analysis

Filezilla-project.org is ranked #203,248 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 36.6K visitors daily, generating a total of 91.8K pageviews. This equates to about 1.1M monthly visitors. Filezilla-project.org traffic has decreased by 8.58% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors36.6K
15.99%
Monthly Visits1.1M
8.58%
Pages per Visit2.51
2.27%
Visit duration02:06
33.96%
Bounce Rate39.17%
13.04%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
36,622
Monthly Visits:
1,109,647
Pages per Visit:
2.51
Daily Pageviews:
91,811
Avg. visit duration:
02:06
Bounce rate:
39.17%
Global Reach:
0.0007429%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
1,117,809
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
750,487
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,077,130
HypeRank:
203,248
SEMrush Rank:
17,431
SimilarWeb Rank:
61,366
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
11.35%
Referral:
12.51%
Search:
73.91%
Social:
2.23%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
82.21%
Mobile:
17.79%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

1M
JUN
1.2M
JUL
1.1M
AUG

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
United States 14.52%
 
India 6.05%
 
Germany 5.39%
 
China 3.80%
 
France 3.58%

Where do visitors go on filezilla-project.org?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
filezilla-project.org
83.84%83.78%1.8
forum.filezilla-project.org
17.08%10.25%1.1
wiki.filezilla-project.org
3.50%3.03%1.6
trac.filezilla-project.org
1.80%1.15%1
OTHER
0%1.79%0

Which sites are competitors to filezilla-project.org?

Websites similar to filezilla-project.org are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 439 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with filezilla-project.org in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
29,700

Moz Data ▼

Domain Authority (DA) is a metric developed by Moz. DA is a score that predicts the ranking potential of a website on search engine result pages (SERPs). Moz calculates Domain Authority on a logarithmic scale from 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating a greater likelihood of ranking well in search results. Moz Domain Authority of filezilla-project.org is 89.
Domain Authority:
  89
Page Authority:
  90
MozRank:
  7

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  filezilla-project.org
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  17,431
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  13,088
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  130,319
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $359,873.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $325.4 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $9.8K and annual gross revenue of approximately $118.8K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $371.1K.

How much would filezilla-project.org make?

Daily Revenue:
$325.39
Monthly Revenue:
$9,761.70
Yearly Revenue:
$118,767.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
United States 13,335$64.41
 
Germany 4,947$6.93
 
India 5,550$2.11
 
France 3,291$1.91
 
China 3,489$0.35

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$14.45
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$433.44
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$5,273.48
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
6,205
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
186,138
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
2,264,683

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
United States 2,400$11.59
 
Germany 1,435$2.01
 
India 1,554$0.59
 
France 362$0.21
 
China 454$0.05

How much is filezilla-project.org worth?

Website Value:
$371.1K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
filezilla-project.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
filezilla-project.org
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
filezilla-project.org
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is filezilla-project.org hosted? ▼

Filezilla-project.org may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2a01:4f8:242:52d0::2, 49.12.121.47
ASN:
AS24940 
ISP:
Hetzner Online GmbH 
Server Location:
Strullendorf
Bavaria, BY
96129
Germany, DE
 

Other sites hosted on 49.12.121.47

How fast does filezilla-project.org load? ▼

The average loading time of filezilla-project.org is 368 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
368 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 95% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 3%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)715ms 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 79% 16% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 16% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 90% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)8ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.5s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 90% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)661ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 14% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)976ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)30ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Contentful Paint 0.3 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Time to Interactive 0.3 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets
Speed Index 0.6 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
First Meaningful Paint 0.3 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.2s 79% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 62% 27% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 27% 9% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 9%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.7s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 81% 12% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 12% 5% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5%
First Input Delay (FID)251ms 2% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2% 94% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 94% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)271ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 58% 41% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 41% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 90% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 6% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 97% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)1.1s 67% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 67% 24% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 24% 7% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.6s 84% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 84% 11% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 11% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4%
First Input Delay (FID)249ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2% 95% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 95% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)288ms 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 47% 52% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 52% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 0.9 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Meaningful Paint 0.9 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Max Potential First Input Delay 50 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Speed Index 1.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Time to Interactive 0.9 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more about performance budgets
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more about performance budgets

Does filezilla-project.org use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on filezilla-project.org are reduced by 65%.
filezilla-project.org use gzip compression.
Original size: 9.02 KB
Compressed size: 3.12 KB
File reduced by: 5.9 KB (65%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. filezilla-project.org has 94 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  94
Safety Confidence:
  58
Child Safety Reputations:
  95
Child Safety Confidence:
  57

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. filezilla-project.org supports HTTPS.
 filezilla-project.org supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: www.filezilla-project.org
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R3
Valid from: Aug 29 20:53:05 2023 GMT
Valid until: Nov 27 20:53:04 2023 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 4096 Bits
Common Name: R3
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Sep 4 00:00:00 2020 GMT
Valid until: Sep 15 16:00:00 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: ISRG Root X1
Organization: Internet Security Research Group
Location: US
Issuer: DST Root CA X3
Valid from: Jan 20 19:14:03 2021 GMT
Valid until: Sep 30 18:14:03 2024 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 4096 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 filezilla-project.org supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Site Categories ▼

Website categories are used to classify websites based on their content or purpose. These categories provide a way to organize and filter websites, allowing users to find relevant information or ensure compliance with specific regulations or policies.
Clients/FTP

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
content-security-policy: default-src 'self' *.filezilla-project.org; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src * blob:
strict-transport-security: max-age=315360000; includeSubDomains; preload
vary: Accept-Encoding
content-encoding: gzip
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-frame-options: deny
content-length: 3195
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 07:43:50 GMT
server: Apache

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
MX filezilla-project.org 28800
TXT v=spf1 mx ip4:49.12.121.47/32 ip6:2a01:4f8:242:52d0::2/64 -all 28800
TXT google-site-verification=VMSIrNYAVoMPTFK6VdS6swSnzPeV9u3oDl2KraQnLI8 28800
SOA 3600
Mname ns1.domaindiscount24.net
Rname tech.key-systems.net
Serial Number 2023092000
Refresh 10800
Retry 3600
Expire 604800
Minimum TTL 3600
AAAA 2a01:4f8:242:52d0::2 28753
A 49.12.121.47 28753
NS ns2.domaindiscount24.net 3553
NS ns3.domaindiscount24.net 3553
NS ns1.domaindiscount24.net 3553

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on January 12, 2005 and will expire on January 12, 2024 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar Key-Systems GmbH. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on February 26, 2023.
Domain Created:
2005-01-12
Domain Expires:
2024-01-12
Domain Updated:
2023-02-26
Domain Age:
19 years 10 months 22 days
Domain Registrar:
Key-Systems GmbH
Domain Owner:
FileZilla
WhoIs:
 

Domain Name: filezilla-project.org
Registry Domain ID: d2e099a08e4e484fa7cb525008639391-LROR
Registrar WHOIS Server: http://whois.rrpproxy.net
Registrar URL: http://www.key-systems.net
Updated Date: 2023-02-26T15:22:43Z
Creation Date: 2005-01-12T15:22:02Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2024-01-12T15:22:02Z
Registrar: Key-Systems GmbH
Registrar IANA ID: 269
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.68949396850
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Organization: FileZilla
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant State/Province: NRW
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Country: DE
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Registrant Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Admin Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Tech Email: Please query the RDDS service of the Registrar of Record identified in this output for information on how to contact the Registrant, Admin, or Tech contact of the queried domain name.
Name Server: ns1.domaindiscount24.net
Name Server: ns2.domaindiscount24.net
Name Server: ns3.domaindiscount24.net
DNSSEC: signedDelegation
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2023-09-21T07:44:36Z