chip.pl Chip.pl

   
CHIP - Technologie mamy we krwi!

Domain Summary

What is the traffic rank for Chip.pl?

• Chip.pl ranks #837,787 globally on HypeStat.

What percent of global Internet users visit Chip.pl?

• 0.0012307% of global Internet users visit Chip.pl

How many people visit Chip.pl each day?

• Chip.pl receives approximately 60.7K visitors and 98,291 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Chip.pl receive most of its visitors from?

• Chip.pl is mostly visited by people located in Poland,Germany,United Kingdom.

How much Chip.pl can earn?

• Chip.pl should earn about $61.71/day from advertising revenue.

What is Chip.pl estimated value?

• Estimated value of Chip.pl is $71,330.69.

What IP addresses does Chip.pl resolve to?

• Chip.pl resolves to the IP addresses 2606:4700:20::ac43:4860, 104.26.14.67.

Where are Chip.pl servers located in?

• Chip.pl has servers located in San Francisco, CA, 94107, United States.

chip.pl Profile

Title:CHIP - Technologie mamy we krwi!
Description:Portal technologiczny piszący o komputerach, podzespołach, smartfonach oraz programach. Newsy, artykuły, testy i rankingi.
Tags:
toshiba
notebooki
karty graficzne
prasa
akcesoria
abit
dyski twarde
gazety
amd
software
asus
hp
komputery
journalism
oprogramowanie
nvidia
artykuły
ati
chip
aktualnosci
Category:Computers Electronics and Technology / Other Computers Electronics and Technology
About: Chip.pl is an online technology portal that provides a wide range of information on various aspects of technology and electronics. The website covers topics including the latest in computer hardware, software, gadgets, and consumer electronics. It also features product reviews, technology news, and how-to guides to help users navigate the complexities of modern tech. Additionally, Chip.pl offers insights and analyses on emerging tech trends and innovations, catering to a diverse audience ranging from tech enthusiasts to professionals in the IT industry. The content is primarily in Polish, making it a valuable resource for the Polish-speaking tech community.
*This text is generated by artificial intelligence and may not be accurate. Edit Site Info

What technologies does chip.pl use?

These are the technologies used at chip.pl. chip.pl has a total of 4 technologies installed in 3 different categories.
CDN
CloudFlare CloudFlare
Miscellaneous
Open Graph Open Graph
PWA PWA
Performance
Priority Hints Priority Hints

chip.pl Traffic Analysis

Chip.pl is ranked #837,787 in the world. This website is viewed by an estimated 60.7K visitors daily, generating a total of 98.3K pageviews. This equates to about 1.8M monthly visitors. Chip.pl traffic has decreased by 37.02% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors60.7K
27.12%
Monthly Visits1.8M
37.02%
Pages per Visit1.62
5.5%
Visit duration00:29
0.24%
Bounce Rate13.38%
5.57%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
60,673
Monthly Visits:
1,838,392
Pages per Visit:
1.62
Daily Pageviews:
98,291
Avg. visit duration:
00:29
Bounce rate:
13.38%
Global Reach:
0.0012307%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
2,816,483
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
988,086
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
1,838,561
HypeRank:
837,787
SEMrush Rank:
3,084,069
SimilarWeb Rank:
44,980
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
88.24%
Referral:
0.12%
Search:
11.53%
Social:
0.11%
Paid:
0%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
3.68%
Mobile:
96.32%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

1.7M
AUG
2.9M
SEP
1.8M
OCT

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Poland 89.69%
 
Germany 3.61%
 
United Kingdom 1.38%
 
Norway 0.54%
 
Italy 0.45%

Where do visitors go on chip.pl?

 
Reach%Pageviews%PerUser
chip.pl
99.40%99.55%1.3
OTHER
0%0.45%0

Which sites are competitors to chip.pl?

Websites similar to chip.pl are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Last update was 20 days ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with chip.pl in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes ▼

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
21,000
Bing Index:
2,300
Baidu Index:
3

  ▼

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  chip.pl
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  3,084,069
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  496
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  150
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $1.00
Full SEMrush Report >>

Revenue report ▼

Google.com would generate approximately $61.7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $1.9K and annual gross revenue of approximately $22.5K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $71.3K.

How much would chip.pl make?

Daily Revenue:
$61.71
Monthly Revenue:
$1,851.30
Yearly Revenue:
$22,524.15
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Poland 88,161$35.26
 
Germany 3,545$4.96
 
United Kingdom 1,353$3.63
 
Norway 532$0.37
 
Italy 439$0.11

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$13.75
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$412.48
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$5,018.56
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
30,519
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
915,572
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
11,139,457

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Poland 29,093$11.64
 
Germany 1,028$1.44
 
United Kingdom 217$0.58
 
Norway 106$0.07
 
Italy 75$0.02

How much is chip.pl worth?

Website Value:
$71.3K

Ad Experience Report ▼

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
chip.pl
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
chip.pl
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:01
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Passing

Abusive Experience Report ▼

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
chip.pl
Last Change Time:
(The last time that the site changed status.)
2018-03-06 16:06:01
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is chip.pl hosted? ▼

Chip.pl may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
2606:4700:20::ac43:4860, 104.26.14.67
ASN:
AS13335 
ISP:
Cloudflare Inc 
Server Location:
San Francisco
CA
94107
United States, US
 

Other sites hosted on 104.26.14.67

How fast does chip.pl load? ▼

The average loading time of chip.pl is 831 ms. The Desktop speed index is 94 and mobile speed index is 56.
Average Load Time:
831 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

94
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)2ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)417ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 92% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)855ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 98% 0% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.3s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 0%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.2s 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 91% 6% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 6% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)2ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 100% 0% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.6s 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 93% 5% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 5% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 0%

Lab Data

First Meaningful Paint 1.1 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more
Avoids `unload` event listeners  
The `unload` event does not fire reliably and listening for it can prevent browser optimizations like the Back-Forward Cache. Use `pagehide` or `visibilitychange` events instead. Learn more
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint 1.3 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more
Max Potential First Input Delay 140 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more
Total Blocking Time 50 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn more
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more
First Contentful Paint 1.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn more
Time to Interactive 1.4 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

56
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 98% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)425ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 3%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)942ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)19ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 1%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.1s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an SLOW speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)39ms 47% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 47% 12% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 12% 40% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 40%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)540ms 89% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 89% 7% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)923ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 2%
First Input Delay (FID)15ms 100% of loads for this page have a fast (<100ms) First Input Delay (FID) 93% 3% of loads for this page have an average 100ms ~ 300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 3% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>300ms) First Input Delay (FID) 2%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0s ~ 0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.8s 87% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 87% 7% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 7% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 4%

Lab Data

First Contentful Paint 3.7 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint 3.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more
Preconnect to required origins  
Consider adding `preconnect` or `dns-prefetch` resource hints to establish early connections to important third-party origins. Learn more
First Contentful Paint (3G) 7320 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network. Learn more
First Meaningful Paint 3.7 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more
Time to Interactive 6.0 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more
Total Blocking Time 850 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more
Avoids `unload` event listeners  
The `unload` event does not fire reliably and listening for it can prevent browser optimizations like the Back-Forward Cache. Use `pagehide` or `visibilitychange` events instead. Learn more
Speed Index 4.5 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more
Timing budget  
Set a timing budget to help you keep an eye on the performance of your site. Performant sites load fast and respond to user input events quickly. Learn more
Performance budget  
Keep the quantity and size of network requests under the targets set by the provided performance budget. Learn more
Has a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more
Max Potential First Input Delay 690 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more

Does chip.pl use compression? ▼

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on chip.pl are reduced by 92%.
chip.pl use br compression.
Original size: 365.22 KB
Compressed size: 28.91 KB
File reduced by: 336.32 KB (92%)

Google Safe Browsing ▼

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites. chip.pl has 91 Safety Reputations.
Status:
  SAFE
Safety Reputations:
  91
Safety Confidence:
  55
Child Safety Reputations:
  90
Child Safety Confidence:
  49

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify ▼

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. chip.pl supports HTTPS.
 chip.pl supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: chip.pl
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: WE1
Valid from: Nov 7 23:54:27 2024 GMT
Valid until: Feb 6 00:54:24 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize:
Common Name: WE1
Organization: Google Trust Services
Location: US
Issuer: GTS Root R4
Valid from: Dec 13 09:00:00 2023 GMT
Valid until: Feb 20 14:00:00 2029 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:
Common Name: GTS Root R4
Organization: Google Trust Services LLC
Location: US
Issuer: GlobalSign Root CA
Valid from: Nov 15 03:43:21 2023 GMT
Valid until: Jan 28 00:00:42 2028 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize:

Verify HTTP/2 Support ▼

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 chip.pl supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Site Categories ▼

Website categories are used to classify websites based on their content or purpose. These categories provide a way to organize and filter websites, allowing users to find relevant information or ensure compliance with specific regulations or policies.
Aktualności i media/Czasopisma

Http Header ▼

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server. 
date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:20:01 GMT
content-type: text/html
location: https://www.chip.pl/
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: master-only
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=IuIdXd49WZHxgKXTDdv68Yyuf%2FjTx0dOd%2BmffqtTbkZCycUyArdiEC93F%2FtowsG5Ifre1bsAa6%2Bzq9L5g2HmyphpHz3NwzXAwBZXExMZbbr7POI72iJwOCk%3D"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 8e2016344f09e7f4-ORD
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=2032&sent=8&recv=12&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3425&recv_bytes=888&delivery_rate=1450175&cwnd=254&unsent_bytes=0&cid=3936ff22f5443483&ts=405&x=0"

HTTP/2 200 
date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:20:02 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
x-nextjs-cache: HIT
cache-control: s-maxage=31536000, stale-while-revalidate
vary: Accept-Encoding
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-permitted-cross-domain-policies: master-only
cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC
report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https://a.nel.cloudflare.com/report/v4?s=d7ZcfC2QcVz7rn8itaKyzotoOn%2Ftgba%2BZblG6EHJ00yBRgkYT4uszAJGEirZnkPb%2FG%2FlASIQMAdNple5pLvtoROwkXJu3mQ5U4i5UzSzDs7XEfIQnlCU8r1uRDI2"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800}
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 8e2016386edb2c46-FRA
content-encoding: br
server-timing: cfL4;desc="?proto=TCP&rtt=98077&sent=7&recv=9&lost=0&retrans=0&sent_bytes=3426&recv_bytes=861&delivery_rate=29537&cwnd=32&unsent_bytes=0&cid=187dc325f869a910&ts=184&x=0"

DNS Lookup ▼

DNS entries (Domain Name System) are a critical component of the Internet infrastructure. They act as directories that translate human-readable domain names (such as example.com) to machine-readable IP addresses. DNS records are stored on DNS servers and help forward internet traffic efficiently.
Type Ip Target/Txt TTL
AAAA 2606:4700:20::681a:f43 221
AAAA 2606:4700:20::681a:e43 221
AAAA 2606:4700:20::ac43:4860 221
A 104.26.14.67 221
A 172.67.72.96 221
A 104.26.15.67 221
NS justin.ns.cloudflare.com 86321
NS kim.ns.cloudflare.com 86321
HINFO 3600

Whois Lookup ▼

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on December 2, 1996 and will expire on December 31, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar https://dns.pl/en/whois. The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on November 10, 2024.
Domain Created:
1996-12-02
Domain Expires:
2025-12-31
Domain Updated:
2024-11-10
Domain Age:
28 years 1 days
Domain Registrar:
https://dns.pl/en/whois
WhoIs:
 


DOMAIN NAME:           chip.pl

registrant type:       individual

nameservers:           justin.ns.cloudflare.com. 

                       kim.ns.cloudflare.com. 

created:               1996.12.02 12:00:00

last modified:         2024.11.10 00:17:01

renewal date:          2025.12.31 13:00:00



option created:        2024.01.19 12:24:49

option expiration date:       2027.01.19 12:24:49



dnssec:                Unsigned





REGISTRAR:

dhosting.pl Sp. z o.o.

Al. Jerozolimskie 98

00-807 Warszawa

Polska/Poland

+48.22 2920101

http://dhosting.pl/kontakt



WHOIS database responses: https://dns.pl/en/whois



WHOIS displays data with a delay not exceeding 15 minutes in relation to the .pl Registry system