User talk:Drewski720

Your submission at Articles for creation: Washington Speakers Bureau (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Washington Speakers Bureau and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing and providing specific feedback. Before I proceed, what about the 3rd source? It's the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). I came into this thinking the WSJ citation was the best I could find in terms of meeting those 4 points of criteria. To your point, we may still need more than this, but I was hoping the WSJ citation would for sure help us build a foundation here. Drewski720 (talk) 07:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Thank you for reviewing and providing specific feedback. Before I proceed, what about the 3rd source? It's the Wall Street Journal (WSJ). I came into this thinking the WSJ citation was the best I could find in terms of meeting those 4 points of criteria. To your point, we may still need more than this, but I was hoping the WSJ citation would for sure help us build a foundation here. Drewski720 (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, the publication is obviously legit. I thought it was just routine business reporting based on a press release, but perhaps I was being harsh. I'll need to look at it again with better time, if it goes on to analyse or comment on things, beyond just the expected acquisition, then that could count as well. Leave it with me, I'll get back to you on that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for waiting. Yeah, that WSJ piece is better than I first thought, and with that I think we've got the WP:NCORP notability standard met, or at least close enough that I can accept this draft. I'll go and do that now. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

@DoubleGrazing Amazing! Thank you for your help and the detailed feedback! Drewski720 (talk) 04:24, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Drewski720! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Washington Speakers Bureau has been accepted

Washington Speakers Bureau, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Drewski720, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Drewski720, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:29, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atomic Object (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gheus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atomic Object and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 13:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

@Gheus Thank you for taking the time to review this submission and provide helpful feedback. I've gone ahead and (hopefully) fixed the issues with tone. As for the draft's references, I reviewed them all again and believe they each meet the 4-part criteria (namely the WSJ and NYT articles), but I could be wrong. If possible, please let me know which of these do not, and then I'll work to find a replacement or postpone this endeavor until more/better references are available. Thank you so much. Drewski720 (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Please read WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:CORPTRIV and give me your two best sources about this topic. Gheus (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2025 (UTC)