- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (talk) 00:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Super Granny 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable video game. Unreferenced. This is the third game in the series, yet no articles about any of the other 3 games yet exist. Game is only casually noted in news sources related to the producing company. Millbrooky (talk) 21:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with/Redirect to Sandlot Games per nomination.Bsimmons666 (talk) 22:22, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 02:29, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete — lack of verifiable sources establishing notability. At least I stopped looking after three straight pages on a Google search with nothing but sites saying download our free trial now! MuZemike (talk) 02:36, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/Delete per MuZemike. Nifboy (talk) 16:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as with Jane's Hotel, there's a Gamezebo review, which is not unusual but is usable, but no second quality source to back it up, notability not demonstrated. If Jay is Games also reviews a game then there's a chance, but if it's just Gamezebo then it's snookered. The casual sector is stagnating and additional review sites just aren't happening. Someoneanother 23:26, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.